• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
Logo

Work Zone Safety Information Clearinghouse

Library of Resources to Improve Roadway Work Zone Safety for All Roadway Users

  • About
  • Newsletter
  • Contact
  • X
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Work Zone Data
    • At a Glance
    • National & State Traffic Data
    • Work Zone Traffic Crash Trends and Statistics
    • Worker Fatalities and Injuries at Road Construction Sites
  • Topics of Interest
    • Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety
    • Smart Work Zones
    • Work Zone Safety and MobilityTransportation Management Plans
    • Accommodating Pedestrians
    • Worker Safety and Welfare
    • Project Coordination in Work Zones
  • Training
    • Online Courses
    • FHWA Safety Grant Products
    • Toolboxes
    • Flagger
    • Certification and
      Accreditation
  • Work Zone Devices
  • Laws, Standards & Policies
  • Public Awareness
  • About
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Search
Publication

A Comparison of Pressure Treated Wood and Cedar Signposts

Author/Presenter: Griffith, Andrew
Abstract:

This report compares the use of pressure treated wood and cedar for signposts. Both materials are being used by the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), however sign crews are now primarily using Port Orford cedar posts.
There are two types of pressure treated posts used by ODOT, Douglas-fir treated with Ammoniacal Copper Zinc Arsenate (ACZA) and Hem-fir treated with Chromated Copper Arsenate (CCA). There are environmental concerns about the use of pressure treated wood. However, studies cited in this report have shown it is not detrimental to the environment.
Based on price data provided by pressure treated wood suppliers, the purchase price for ACZA treated Douglas-fir is slightly higher than Port Orford cedar. Some of the suppliers expressed concerns about the availability of Hem-fir posts that would meet ODOT specifications.
The average disposal cost for pressure treated wood based on disposal at a landfill or waste transfer facility is slightly higher than cedar. In actual practice, sign crews dispose Port Orford cedar wastes in existing waste containers, thus eliminating the added disposal fee incurred by taking it directly to a landfill or waste transfer facility.
In a survey of ODOT sign crews, they unanimously favor using Port Orford cedar posts over pressure treated posts.
In Oregon State University’s wood post studies, Port Orford cedar posts lasted an average of 20 years, whereas pressure treated wood posts remained in service one-and-a-half to three times longer than Port Orford cedar. ODOT sign crews assert that only a small number of posts are replaced because of rotting, indicating a 20 year life is adequate for a signpost.
Based on the information presented in this report, Port Orford cedar is the most appropriate signpost material to meet ODOT requirements.

Publisher: Oregon Department of Transportation
Publication Date: November 1999
Full Text URL: Link to URL
Publication Types: Books, Reports, Papers, and Research Articles
Topics: Sign Supports; Traffic Control Devices

Copyright © 2025 American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA). The National Work Zone Safety Information Clearinghouse is a project of the ARTBA Transportation Development Foundation. It is operated in cooperation with the U.S. Federal Highway Administration and Texas A&M Transportation Institute. | Copyright Statement · Privacy Policy · Disclaimer
American Road and Transportation Builders Association Transportation Development Foundation, American Road and Transportation Builders Association U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Texas A&M Transportation Institute