• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
Logo

Work Zone Safety Information Clearinghouse

Library of Resources to Improve Roadway Work Zone Safety for All Roadway Users

  • About
  • Join Listserv
  • Contact
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Work Zone Data
    • At a Glance
    • National & State Traffic Data
    • Work Zone Traffic Crash Trends and Statistics
    • Worker Fatalities and Injuries at Road Construction Sites
  • Topics of Interest
    • Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety
    • Smart Work Zones
    • Transportation Management Plans
    • Accommodating Pedestrians
    • Worker Safety and Welfare
    • Project Coordination in Work Zones
  • Training
    • Flagger
    • Online Courses
    • Toolboxes
    • FHWA Safety Grant Products
    • Certification and
      Accreditation
  • Work Zone Devices
  • Laws, Standards & Policies
    • COVID-19 Guidance
  • Public Awareness
  • Events
  • About
  • Listserv
  • Contact
  • Search
Publication

Appeals Court Declares Contractor Owes Special Duty in Work Zone Death

Abstract:

A Louisiana Court of Appeals upheld a lower court judgment in favor of the plaintiffs against the State Department of Transportation and Development, and then extended the original judgment and found that a local contractor was also negligent. The appeal in question was lodged by the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development’s Highway Department after a judgment rendered against it in favor of Mr. and Mrs. Jimmy Murphy for the death of their son, Michael Murphy. The Highway Department contended that the lower court erred in not finding the contractor as negligent as it was. The Court of Appeal addressed two basic issues: the liability of the Highway Department, and whether Coastal Contractors, Inc., was equally liable for the death.
The lower court found the Highway Department responsible for the accident, relieving Coastal Contractors of any liability. The Court of Appeal agreed that the State was liable because of substantial and material deviations from good engineering practice at the site of the accident, such as the absence of effective “channelization” in detouring traffic, and that painting over the center and edge stripes on the highway was an inadequate method of obliteration.
Finally, the Court found that both the State Highway Department and Coastal Contractors had the ability to correct the problems at the work site and therefore both must share in the liability.

Source: Road Injury Prevention & Litigation Journal
Publisher: TranSafety, Inc.
Publication Date: March 1999
Notes:

The Clearinghouse has a copy of this item.

Publication Types: News and Other Non-research Articles
Topics: Court Decisions; Crash Causes; Crash Reports; Tort Liability

Copyright © 2023 American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA). The National Work Zone Safety Information Clearinghouse is a project of the ARTBA Transportation Development Foundation. It is operated in cooperation with the U.S. Federal Highway Administration and Texas A&M Transportation Institute. | Copyright Statement · Privacy Policy · Disclaimer
American Road and Transportation Builders Association Transportation Development Foundation, American Road and Transportation Builders Association U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Texas A&M Transportation Institute