• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
Logo

Work Zone Safety Information Clearinghouse

Library of Resources to Improve Roadway Work Zone Safety for All Roadway Users

  • About
  • Join Listserv
  • Contact
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Work Zone Data
    • At a Glance
    • National & State Traffic Data
    • Work Zone Traffic Crash Trends and Statistics
    • Worker Fatalities and Injuries at Road Construction Sites
  • Topics of Interest
    • Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety
    • Smart Work Zones
    • Transportation Management Plans
    • Accommodating Pedestrians
    • Worker Safety and Welfare
    • Project Coordination in Work Zones
  • Training
    • Flagger
    • Online Courses
    • Toolboxes
    • FHWA Safety Grant Products
    • Certification and
      Accreditation
  • Work Zone Devices
  • Laws, Standards & Policies
    • COVID-19 Guidance
  • Public Awareness
  • Events
  • About
  • Listserv
  • Contact
  • Search
Publication

Determining the Effectiveness of Graphic-aided Dynamic Message Signs in Work Zone

Author/Presenter: Bai, Yong; Huang, Yilei; Schrock, Steven D.; Li, Yue
Abstract:

Portable changeable message signs (PCMSs) have been employed in highway work zones as an innovative temporary traffic control
(TTC) device in the United Stated for many years. The traditional message format on a PCMS is text-based, which has been found to
have several limitations in recent studies, such as confusing drivers and delaying their responses during driving, being difficult to read
for older drivers and non-English-speaking drivers, and having a short range of legibility. The use of graphic-aided messages on PCMSs
has many advantages over text-based PCMSs based on a number of previous laboratory simulation experiments. This research project
used field experiments and driver surveys to determine the effectiveness of a graphic-aided PCMS on reducing vehicle speed and
drivers’ acceptance of utilizing a graphic-aided PCMS in the upstream of a one-lane two-way rural highway work zone. Field
experiment were conducted to compare the effectiveness of text PCMS, graphic-aided PCMS, and graphic PCMS on reducing vehicle
speed in a highway work zone in Kansas , and to develop regression models of the relationship between mean vehicle speed and
distance under three PCMS conditions. Driver surveys were conducted to evaluate drivers’ opinions on the implementation of a graphicaided
PCMS in the highway work zone. The findings showed that 1) using a text, a graphic-aided, and a graphic PCMS resulted in a
mean vehicle speed reduction of 13%, 10%, and 17%, respectively; 2) using a graphic-aided PCMS reduced mean vehicle speed more
effectively than using a text PCMS from 1,475 ft to 1,000 ft in the upstream of a work zone; using a graphic PCMS reduced mean
vehicle speed more effectively than using a text PCMS from 1,475 ft in the upstream of the work zone to the location of the second TTC
sign (W20-4 sign); 3) the majority of drivers understood the work zone and flagger graphics and believed the graphics drew their
attention more to the work zone traffic conditions; and 4) more drivers preferred the information to be presented in the graphic-aided
and graphic formats if the graphic-aided and graphic PCMSs were available.

Publisher: University of Kansas
Publication Date: July 2011
Full Text URL: Link to URL
Publication Types: Books, Reports, Papers, and Research Articles
Topics: Changeable Message Signs; Temporary Traffic Control

Copyright © 2023 American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA). The National Work Zone Safety Information Clearinghouse is a project of the ARTBA Transportation Development Foundation. It is operated in cooperation with the U.S. Federal Highway Administration and Texas A&M Transportation Institute. | Copyright Statement · Privacy Policy · Disclaimer
American Road and Transportation Builders Association Transportation Development Foundation, American Road and Transportation Builders Association U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Texas A&M Transportation Institute