• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
Logo

Work Zone Safety Information Clearinghouse

Library of Resources to Improve Roadway Work Zone Safety for All Roadway Users

  • About
  • Newsletter
  • Contact
  • X
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

  • Work Zone Data
    • At a Glance
    • National & State Traffic Data
    • Work Zone Traffic Crash Trends and Statistics
    • Worker Fatalities and Injuries at Road Construction Sites
  • Topics of Interest
    • Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety
    • Smart Work Zones
    • Work Zone Safety and MobilityTransportation Management Plans
    • Accommodating Pedestrians
    • Worker Safety and Welfare
    • Project Coordination in Work Zones
  • Training
    • Online Courses
    • FHWA Safety Grant Products
    • Toolboxes
    • Flagger
    • Certification and
      Accreditation
  • Work Zone Devices
  • Laws, Standards & Policies
  • Public Awareness
  • About
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Search
Publication

MASH Crashworthiness of Work Zone Devices and Breakaway Luminaire Poles

Author/Presenter: Rajaee, Mohammadreza
Abstract:

This thesis presents a study on the crashworthiness of two commonly-used roadside safety devices: Type II barricades and luminaire poles supported by TB1-17 transformer bases. The first part focuses on designing and evaluating a non-proprietary, Type II barricade that meets MASH criteria. A validated LS-DYNA model, based on a previously-tested Type III barricade, was used to guide the design. The proposed Type II system was evaluated through simulation and confirmed with full-scale crash testing. The second part of the study investigates luminaire poles supported by the TB1-17 transformer base. A previously-developed LS-DYNA model was updated and validated using test No. TBLP-3. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the effects of base thickness, material properties, and bolt preload. A matrix of pole configurations was then simulated to identify systems that meet the MASH longitudinal Occupant Impact Velocity (OIV) limit of 16 ft/s. Both weak- and strong-base scenarios were considered, along with a ±20% error margin to account for modeling and construction uncertainties. Regression analysis was used to assess the role of pole characteristics, such as weight, center of gravity, and moment of inertia. The results showed that while pole geometry affects crash response, base properties remain the most critical factor.

Publisher: University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Publication Date: May 2025
Full Text URL: Link to URL
Publication Types: Books, Reports, Papers, and Research Articles
Topics: Barricades; Crash Tests; Support Poles

Copyright © 2025 American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA). The National Work Zone Safety Information Clearinghouse is a project of the ARTBA Transportation Development Foundation. It is operated in cooperation with the U.S. Federal Highway Administration and Texas A&M Transportation Institute. | Copyright Statement · Privacy Policy · Disclaimer
American Road and Transportation Builders Association Transportation Development Foundation, American Road and Transportation Builders Association U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Texas A&M Transportation Institute