• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
Logo

Work Zone Safety Information Clearinghouse

Library of Resources to Improve Roadway Work Zone Safety for All Roadway Users

  • About
  • Join Listserv
  • Contact
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Work Zone Data
    • At a Glance
    • National & State Traffic Data
    • Work Zone Traffic Crash Trends and Statistics
    • Worker Fatalities and Injuries at Road Construction Sites
  • Topics of Interest
    • Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety
    • Smart Work Zones
    • Transportation Management Plans
    • Accommodating Pedestrians
    • Worker Safety and Welfare
    • Project Coordination in Work Zones
  • Training
    • Flagger
    • Online Courses
    • Toolboxes
    • FHWA Safety Grant Products
    • Certification and
      Accreditation
  • Work Zone Devices
  • Laws, Standards & Policies
    • COVID-19 Guidance
  • Public Awareness
  • Events
  • About
  • Listserv
  • Contact
  • Search
Publication

Minnesota Contractor and Subcontractor Had No Duty for Detour Route Outside Construction Zone

Abstract:

Two passengers died and a third suffered serious injury when the driver of the vehicle in which they rode drove the wrong way in a construction zone detour and hit another vehicle. Representatives of the deceased passengers sued the driver, the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MN/DOT), and Shafer Contracting Company (Shafer), the contractor responsible for the road construction project. Warning Lites of Minnesota, Inc. (Warning Lites), a subcontractor to Shafer, eventually became an additional direct defendant. The plaintiffs claimed negligence on the parts of both contractors based on their failure to meet contractual and common law duties. An additional claim against Warning Lites alleged the contractor assumed a duty by voluntarily inspecting the traffic control devices on the detour.
The Dakota County District Court granted summary judgment favoring Shafer and Warning Lites on the first claims of negligence. However, the court denied summary judgment for Warning Lites on the claim of voluntary assumption of duty. The Court of Appeals of Minnesota subsequently affirmed summary judgments for the contractors on negligence claims and reversed the decision against Warning Lites, finding motorists had not relied on the subcontractor’s voluntary inspection to provide their safety on the detour. This summary describes the contractors’ appeal.

Source: Road Injury Prevention & Litigation Journal
Publication Date: July 1997
Notes:

The Clearinghouse has a copy of this item.

Publication Types: News and Other Non-research Articles
Topics: Court Decisions; Crash Causes; Crash Reports; Detours; Tort Liability

Copyright © 2023 American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA). The National Work Zone Safety Information Clearinghouse is a project of the ARTBA Transportation Development Foundation. It is operated in cooperation with the U.S. Federal Highway Administration and Texas A&M Transportation Institute. | Copyright Statement · Privacy Policy · Disclaimer
American Road and Transportation Builders Association Transportation Development Foundation, American Road and Transportation Builders Association U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Texas A&M Transportation Institute