• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
Logo

Work Zone Safety Information Clearinghouse

Library of Resources to Improve Roadway Work Zone Safety for All Roadway Users

  • About
  • Newsletter
  • Contact
  • X
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Work Zone Data
    • At a Glance
    • National & State Traffic Data
    • Work Zone Traffic Crash Trends and Statistics
    • Worker Fatalities and Injuries at Road Construction Sites
  • Topics of Interest
    • Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety
    • Smart Work Zones
    • Work Zone Safety and MobilityTransportation Management Plans
    • Accommodating Pedestrians
    • Worker Safety and Welfare
    • Project Coordination in Work Zones
  • Training
    • Online Courses
    • FHWA Safety Grant Products
    • Toolboxes
    • Flagger
    • Certification and
      Accreditation
  • Work Zone Devices
  • Laws, Standards & Policies
  • Public Awareness
  • About
  • Events
  • Contact
  • Search
Publication

Probabilistic Versus Non-Probabilistic Machine Learning Approaches for Estimating the Severity of Crashes in Construction Work Zones

Author/Presenter: Hassandokht Mashhadi, Ali; Mohammadi, Pouria; Rashidi, Abbas; Medina, Juan C.; Markovic, Nikola
Abstract:

Roadway work zones often present hazardous conditions for drivers, pedestrians, and construction workers. Understanding the factors contributing to work zone crashes and their severity can assist the departments of transportation (DOTs) in safety management and planning. Accordingly, this study investigated the effect of freeway work zones on the severity of crashes by employing machine learning algorithms. The model was developed using crash data and construction zone information from Utah between 2017 and 2021. This study compares the performance of probabilistic and non-probabilistic machine learning models in predicting work zone crash severity using the KABCO severity scale. All three models achieved promising accuracy levels, with Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) achieving the highest accuracy at 86%, followed by Gaussian Naïve Bayes (GNB) with an accuracy of 76%, and complement Naïve Bayes (CNB) with an accuracy of 74%. The findings of this study offer valuable insights for the safety management plans of DOTs.

Source: Construction Research Congress 2024
Publication Date: March 18, 2024
Source URL: Link to URL
Publication Types: Books, Reports, Papers, and Research Articles
Topics: Crash Severity; Machine Learning; Safety Management; Work Zone Safety; Work Zones

Copyright © 2025 American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA). The National Work Zone Safety Information Clearinghouse is a project of the ARTBA Transportation Development Foundation. It is operated in cooperation with the U.S. Federal Highway Administration and Texas A&M Transportation Institute. | Copyright Statement · Privacy Policy · Disclaimer
American Road and Transportation Builders Association Transportation Development Foundation, American Road and Transportation Builders Association U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Texas A&M Transportation Institute