• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
Logo

Work Zone Safety Information Clearinghouse

Library of Resources to Improve Roadway Work Zone Safety for All Roadway Users

  • About
  • Join Listserv
  • Contact
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Work Zone Data
    • At a Glance
    • National & State Traffic Data
    • Work Zone Traffic Crash Trends and Statistics
    • Worker Fatalities and Injuries at Road Construction Sites
  • Topics of Interest
    • Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety
    • Smart Work Zones
    • Transportation Management Plans
    • Accommodating Pedestrians
    • Worker Safety and Welfare
    • Project Coordination in Work Zones
  • Training
    • Flagger
    • Online Courses
    • Toolboxes
    • FHWA Safety Grant Products
    • Certification and
      Accreditation
  • Work Zone Devices
  • Laws, Standards & Policies
    • COVID-19 Guidance
  • Public Awareness
  • Events
  • About
  • Listserv
  • Contact
  • Search
Publication

Sight-Distance Requirements at Lane-Closure Work Zones on Urban Freeways

Author/Presenter: Richards, Stephen H.; Dudek, Conrad L.
Abstract:

Findings of field studies conducted to evaluate the effects of sight distance to lane closures at urban freeway work zones are presented and discussed. The studies investigated the interaction of sight distance with traffic volume and various work-zone traffic-control features (e. g., advance signing and arrowboards). The studies were conducted at 15 maintenance work zones of freeways in Houston, Dallas, Fort Worth, San Antonio, and Corpus Christi, Texas. The studies revealed that, as sight distance to a lane closure decreases, more and more drivers are ” trapped” in the closed lane at the taper area. At sites where the sight distance was less than 1000 ft, for example, up to 80 percent of the traffic in the closed lane did not leave the closed lane until reaching the immediate vicinity of the lane-closure taper. Sight distance becomes even more critical as traffic volumes increase. Based on the study findings, a minimum desirable sight distance of 1500 ft was recommended for lane-closure work zones on freeways. The studies also suggest that advance signing for lane closures is only partly effective. In the studies, only half of the affected drivers responded to the advance signing evaluated. Arrowboards were also studied and proved to be effective traffic-control devices for lane closures where sight distance is adequate, since they encourage early lane changing.

Source: Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Volume: 864
Publisher: Transportation Research Board
Publication Date: 1982
Full Text URL: Link to URL
Publication Types: Books, Reports, Papers, and Research Articles
Topics: Arrow Panels; Lane Closure; Temporary Traffic Control; Traffic Control Devices; Traffic Signs; Urban Highways

Copyright © 2023 American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA). The National Work Zone Safety Information Clearinghouse is a project of the ARTBA Transportation Development Foundation. It is operated in cooperation with the U.S. Federal Highway Administration and Texas A&M Transportation Institute. | Copyright Statement · Privacy Policy · Disclaimer
American Road and Transportation Builders Association Transportation Development Foundation, American Road and Transportation Builders Association U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Texas A&M Transportation Institute