• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
Logo

Work Zone Safety Information Clearinghouse

Library of Resources to Improve Roadway Work Zone Safety for All Roadway Users

  • About
  • Newsletter
  • Contact
  • X
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Work Zone Data
    • At a Glance
    • National & State Traffic Data
    • Work Zone Traffic Crash Trends and Statistics
    • Worker Fatalities and Injuries at Road Construction Sites
  • Topics of Interest
    • Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety
    • Smart Work Zones
    • Work Zone Safety and MobilityTransportation Management Plans
    • Accommodating Pedestrians
    • Worker Safety and Welfare
    • Project Coordination in Work Zones
  • Training
    • Flagger
    • Online Courses
    • Toolboxes
    • FHWA Safety Grant Products
    • Certification and
      Accreditation
  • Work Zone Devices
  • Laws, Standards & Policies
  • Public Awareness
  • Events
  • About
  • Contact
  • Search
Publication

Multivariate Regression for Estimating Driving Behavior Parameters in Work Zone Simulation to Replicate Field Capacities

Author/Presenter: Edara, Praveen; Chatterjee, Indrajit
Abstract:

Traffic simulation tools are being increasingly adopted by DOTs for various traffic analysis studies, including assessing work zone traffic impacts. This is due, in part, to their ability to model individual vehicle and driver behavior at a highly detailed level to assess the traffic performance. In order to accurately use the simulation models for traffic analysis of work zones, it is necessary to calibrate the models to match the field conditions (such as lane capacity and queue lengths) by adjusting the driving behavior parameters. Unfortunately, there is very little guidance on choosing the driving behavior parameters in simulation models that will replicate the actual field conditions in work zones. Empirical studies have shown that the roadway capacities at work zones are not only lower than the capacities under normal operating conditions but also vary across all states in the US. This disparity means that a unique driving behavior parameter set cannot be used by all states; instead the parameter values should be chosen so as to reproduce the state-specific capacity values. The default truck characteristics inside the VISSIM simulation model are different from the average characteristics of trucks on US freeways. The use of default truck characteristics that are not representative of the US conditions results in incorrect calibration and therefore erratic conclusions. Based on a review of national studies on truck characteristics (length, weight to power ratio, etc) we recommend US specific values for use in VISSIM. The recommended values are generic and are applicable to facilities other than work zones. In this study, we develop multivariate regression models to express the relationship between the critical driving behavior parameters of the VISSIM model, work zone lane configuration, truck percentages, and work zone capacity. The estimated statistical models are capable of generating a range of parameters’ values that produce a wide range of capacities used by state DOTs in the US. Model validation is also conducted using field data from work zone sites in Ohio. The validation results showed that the model recommended values are capable of producing accurate estimates of capacity and queue lengths.

Source: Transportation Letters: The International Journal of Transportation Research
Volume: 2
Issue: 3
Publication Date: 2010
Source URL: Link to URL
Publication Types: Books, Reports, Papers, and Research Articles
Topics: Behavior; Impacts; Traffic Simulation; Work Zone Capacity; Work Zones

Copyright © 2025 American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA). The National Work Zone Safety Information Clearinghouse is a project of the ARTBA Transportation Development Foundation. It is operated in cooperation with the U.S. Federal Highway Administration and Texas A&M Transportation Institute. | Copyright Statement · Privacy Policy · Disclaimer
American Road and Transportation Builders Association Transportation Development Foundation, American Road and Transportation Builders Association U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Texas A&M Transportation Institute